Which interruption is characterized as aggressive and seeks to dominate the conversation?

The interruption characterized as aggressive and seeking to dominate the conversation is competitive interruption. This type of interruption often involves interjecting in a forceful manner, with the intent to take control of the dialogue rather than to contribute meaningfully or collaboratively.

In competitive interruptions, the person interrupting usually aims to assert their opinions or ideas over those of others, often disregarding the speaker's flow and connection. This style can lead to a confrontational atmosphere, diminishing the opportunity for balanced exchange and discouraging others from voicing their thoughts.

In contrast, non-competitive interruption tends to be more supportive and collaborative, allowing space for the speaker while still interjecting. A content-only response focuses on the topic at hand rather than the dynamics of the conversation, while back channeling involves making small verbal acknowledgments to indicate listening, encouraging the speaker to continue. Thus, while these other forms of response contribute differently to interpersonal communication, competitive interruption explicitly seeks to dominate the exchange, which distinguishes it in this context.